American Nationalists Are Incompetent

by Zoltanous

Before proceeding, I suggest reading the following publication first:

Tucker Carlson and MAGA Communism

In essence, the article explains that Tucker Carlson effect on America. Additionally, it mentions the emergence of MagaCommunism, with proponents like Jackson Hinkle and Infrared, indicating a convergence of conservative and Marxist elements under the Maga movement, targeting the disruption of liberal dominance. Dugin then suggests that this presents a “viable left wing alternative.” I want to clarify why this situation is, in fact, quite disappointing.

It's disappointing to witness the neglect of numerous nationalist efforts, with Alexander Dugin's focus shifting to Haz's MagaCommunism. In retrospect, I saw this coming. Haz distinctly deviates from Dugin's philosophy, primarily embracing Multipolarity and the concept of Civilization-States. Unlike Dugin's aim to combine the right wing of communism with the left wing of fascism, Haz strictly opposes such fusion, insisting on adherence to Marxism-Leninism for collaboration. My discussions with him have highlighted his rigid stance. Dugin, in contrast, has shown flexibility in collaborating with fascists. The most notable effort in the U.S. to align with Dugin's theories was undertaken by the Traditionalist Workers party (TWP), which planned to attend an international meeting in Russia to discuss Multipolarity, hosted Dugin. Numerous organizations from South America, North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East were slated to attend. Unfortunately, TWP's disintegration, due to the "cuck box" incident, has made Dugin hesitant to interact with American nationalists, whom he perceives as disorganized and ineffective. Furthermore, Heimbach consistently found himself in situations that negatively impacted his image in the American media.

Infrared, despite its flaws, has not faced such public disgrace, positioning Haz as a potential ally for Russians and the Chinese. The absence of a strong American organization supporting Dugin's Fourth Political Theory is evident, with most neo-fascist groups either supporting Ukraine or maintaining a neutral, yet Kremlin-skeptical stance, like Joel Davis in Australia. This situation presents a significant hurdle for America First supporters like Nick Fuentes. His endorsement of Russia and China, is hampered by a critique of specific Putin policies and along with Nick’s absence of political and economic proposals beyond those associated with racism, have caused both nations to perceive him as less influential, further diminishing his standing.

My dissatisfaction stems from Infrared's approach to fascism and disregard for pro-Russian fascists. For Haz to succeed, I believe he should reconsider his stance on the Romanovs, adjust his narrative about Jews, and be more open to working with nationalists. His strategy should not just promote patriotism but tap into a deeper nationalistic fervor that Americans are craving. I have always maintained that for nationalism to succeed in America, we should embrace a strategy akin to the Maoist Mass Line, fostering vanguardism and rallying the masses towards a revolution. This strategy entails collaborating with the Maga movement and prioritizing union efforts, particularly with truckers and rail workers. Infrared's public adoption of these tactics I've long supported only underscores the American nationalist movement's lack of effectiveness. The endorsement of Haz by China and Dugin serves as a stark confirmation of our shortcomings. The American nationalist scene's fixation on vulgar racism, internal disputes, and extreme propositions is leading to our downfall.